3rd and last spoiler!

what if saph got preg and then she died?

NO! SHE WON'T DIE!!!

She won't die, I know it! Besides, if it was the elf girl, it would make eragon seemed real flawed. Before, his main flaw was his ignorance, but he seems to be losing that. What better way to make someone look horrible than to have a child out of wedlock?

Wait! Are you saying you WANT it to be the elf girl?

Aravelle wrote:

She won't die, I know it! Besides, if it was the elf girl, it would make eragon seemed real flawed. Before, his main flaw was his ignorance, but he seems to be losing that. What better way to make someone look horrible than to have a child out of wedlock?

No! It can't be her! Parents will stop kids from reading the books! CP wouldn't do that. Besides, she was only in like, 2 paragraphs of the series. CP would have spent more time on her if she was going to become a major character. I mean, the Elva thing was ver unexpected, but CP actually really emphasizaed that part of the book.

yes true true.

Yup! So it must be Saphira!

It's def saph.

I still think it's a possibilty for it to be NEC though. (NEC=Nameless Elf Chick)

erm. no.

Why not?

THATS JUST WRONG! CP wouldn't do that! Think of all of the angry parents who would make their kids stop reading the books! Not to mention that an elf mating with a human would probobly make some sort of freak child thing.

Hmm. Well that last point wouldn't work because of Eragon and Arya but otherwise that's why Sam that's why.

eragon5217 wrote:

Hmm. Well that last point wouldn't work because of Eragon and Arya but otherwise that's why Sam that's why.

Your logic is all messed up. See, an elf plus a human obviously equals some sort of weird freakish part elf-part human thing. It genetics, and we know it for a FACT. However, Arya+Eragon is just an assumed thing that has no real evedence. It's NOT a fact. So you must have meant to say "Well Eragon and Arya wouldn't work because of that last point but otherwise that's why Sam that's why."
Basically you're basing a fact off of an asumtion, while I'm basing an asumtion off of a fact. Mine is obviously more logical, even you must admit.

Well we wouldn't really know elf's genetics because you know they DON'T EXIST!!!! So Arya+Eragon is still my theory.

Of course I don't know an elf genetics (maybe...), but I do know enough about genetics that Human+other creature=mutated freak thing.

Eragon looks enough like an elf so it won't be a mutated freak thing.

eragon5217 wrote:

Eragon looks enough like an elf so it won't be a mutated freak thing.

*rolls eyes* That's because his body was magically altered by a spirit-dragon, NOT because his father was a human and his mother was an elf!

yes but he looks like an elf so it won't be a mutated freak thing!

No! He is a human who looks like an elf as a result of a spell. If he married Arya, their kid would be a half-human, half-elf thing.

A human and elf can have a baby lol...it wont be like a freak or anything it would be like what eragon looks like now more nice looking than any human but uglier than any elf...

Yes! Exactly what I have been trying to tell Zeb!

I still disagree. Even if it wouldn't be freaky or somthing like that (which it WOULD), it's still just wrong. I mean, it's like a cat and a dog mating and having pups/kittens. Yeah, they're similar creatures, but they are still very different! Besides, it's just WRONG.

nah I'm against the elf chick thing as you know. I'm saying this because of the Eragon+Arya thing. I mean elf chick def not happening. Sorry sam.

okey then a donkey and horse can give birth to a mule....and a tiger and lion can give birth to somthing but i cant remember its name....so why cant an elf and human?? Hmmm?